Skip to content
    ← Podcast
    CAREER STRATEGY
    Podcast 13 min read

    6 Skills That Make Creatives Irreplaceable w/ Chris Do

    with Chris Do

    Chris Do makes the case for six creative skills that shift professional value beyond production as AI advances.

    Chris Do

    Chris Do

    Founder, The Futur™ · April 29, 2026

    The work is no longer the whole offer

    A strong portfolio is not the whole defense against automation. Chris Do, who ran Blind, a service production company making commercials for advertising agencies and large global brands, argues that creative professionals need a broader source of value. His perspective comes from competing for substantial assignments, then learning to communicate beyond the client meeting through cameras and public speaking.

    The anxiety he addresses is straightforward: AI tools are improving, and the ability to produce something no longer feels like sufficient protection. His response is not a promise that every creative job will survive. It is a distinction between the work someone performs and the skills that make that person valuable.

    A job describes an assignment. A skill can travel beyond it.

    That distinction matters because his argument is not really about defending a particular piece of software, production technique, or professional title. It is about changing what the client relies on the creative professional to provide. Faster execution is one offer. Helping someone decide what deserves execution is another.

    Do begins with strategic thinking and problem solving: defining the problem, asking useful questions, and helping a client navigate ambiguity. His contrast is between generating an answer and establishing what the answer needs to accomplish. A response can be competent while still addressing the wrong concern.

    “Strategy is about framing, not just responding,” he says.

    In his account, much of creative work's historical value sat in knowing what to do and how to do it. As tools make execution more accessible, he places greater importance on why something should be done. The client conversation becomes central, not an inconvenient preliminary to the real work.

    That conversation has a practical purpose. Strategic questions can expose conflicting ideas, align expectations, and connect an immediate request to a longer-term intention. The creative professional is no longer merely accepting a brief as a settled description of reality. The brief becomes something to examine.

    The commercial question behind that shift also sits in the title of Can You Charge To Diagnose?: whether understanding the problem belongs inside the professional's offer, rather than outside it as unpaid preparation.

    Do's claims about what AI cannot do are sweeping. The useful career argument does not require treating every present limitation as permanent. It requires recognizing the responsibility he wants creatives to assume: helping a particular client choose a direction, rather than stopping at the delivery of options.

    That is the tension running through his advice. The person most comfortable being left alone to make the work is being asked to become more involved in the decisions surrounding it. Not less creative. More accountable for what the creativity is supposed to achieve.

    The brief has an emotional underside

    A client hesitates at the word rebrand. Nothing in the formal assignment has changed, but the conversation has. Do uses that small moment to explain why emotional intelligence belongs alongside strategic thinking, not beneath it as a pleasant interpersonal extra.

    The spoken request is only part of the information available. A pause, an awkward silence, or a shift in body language can signal that the conversation needs attention. His point is not that the creative should rush to diagnose the hidden feeling. It is that the feeling should not be ignored simply because it was absent from the brief.

    “If you can read the room, you can lead the room,” Do says.

    Leadership here means responding to the people actually present, rather than delivering an explanation prepared for an imaginary, perfectly rational buyer. Someone can understand the proposed work and still feel uncertain about the person proposing it. More information alone does not necessarily address that uncertainty.

    Do locates two different responsibilities in this part of the client relationship:

    • Strategic thinking and problem solving. Define the problem, ask better questions, and reconcile competing ideas.
    • Emotional intelligence and empathy. Notice hesitation, listen for subtext, and help people feel understood.

    The first clarifies the decision. The second attends to the person making it. Confusing the two leaves a gap: a logically sound recommendation can still fail to connect, while a comfortable conversation can leave the underlying problem unresolved.

    Branding makes this distinction especially visible in Do's account. He describes attachment to shoes, hotels, cars, and consumer electronics as something that exceeds an inventory of features. People form feelings about products, services, and even businesses they never encounter as individual human beings.

    He asks creatives to examine their own purchasing decisions. A buyer can explain a choice through price or service while also responding to a familiar hometown, a shared interest, or a sense of ease with the seller. Those impressions belong to the decision, even when they are not the explanation offered afterward.

    This is his warning against overemphasizing features, functions, and price in a sales conversation. Those details still belong in the discussion. But they do not exhaust what the prospect is evaluating. The person selling the work is also communicating whether the client will feel heard.

    The interpersonal side of selling is a related subject in The Skill You Need To Win Clients That No One Talks About (but should). Here, Do's emphasis stays on the difference between presenting competence and establishing connection.

    Empathy, in this argument, is not a decorative layer applied to a sales pitch. It changes what the professional notices and therefore what gets addressed. A hesitation becomes a reason to listen more carefully, not an obstacle to push past on the way to approval.

    Originality requires room to be wrong

    The next tension is inside the creative process itself. Do wants professionals to develop judgment and confidence, but he also wants them to tolerate work that begins without either. A promising idea does not necessarily arrive looking orderly, defensible, or ready for a client presentation.

    His description of conceptual ideation is deliberately untidy. Creative people connect lived experiences, recent learning, difficult lessons, and observations whose relevance was not obvious when they first encountered them. The resulting connection does not have to follow a straight path to be useful.

    “The courage to be wrong is what creates originality,” he says.

    That line moves the discussion away from originality as a mysterious personal gift. Courage concerns behavior: whether someone is prepared to explore an uncertain connection before knowing that it will work. A process organized entirely around avoiding error leaves little space for that exploration.

    Do contrasts pattern recognition with pattern breaking. He characterizes AI as skilled at working with what already exists, while placing human creative value in risky conceptual leaps. His categorical description of machine originality is his position, not something the career advice needs to establish as an eternal technical boundary.

    The more durable distinction is between requesting variations and taking responsibility for an unfamiliar idea. A professional still has to decide which connection is worth developing, what makes it relevant, and whether to keep working when its first expression is unconvincing.

    Do describes divergent thinkers as people who assume that a problem can have multiple solutions. The point is not to produce alternatives indefinitely. It is to avoid treating the first plausible route as the only available route before the creative possibilities have been considered.

    There is an important balance here. Earlier, strategy established the need to frame a problem carefully. Now, ideation resists making the solution equally rigid too soon. A defined purpose and an open creative process are not opposites. They give each other a reason to exist.

    The brief supplies a direction. It should not predetermine every move.

    Do's encouragement to accept a messy process is especially pointed for professionals who judge themselves by visible efficiency. He calls creativity wasteful and nonlinear, describing connections that emerge through a tangled rather than direct route. Under that account, not every useful hour produces a presentable artifact.

    This is not a defense of confusion for its own sake. His stated aim remains the most desirable outcome among possible solutions. The mess belongs to the search, not necessarily to the finished explanation. Exploration needs enough freedom to generate something worth selecting.

    That creates the next problem. If a creative professional can entertain several directions, the ability to distinguish among them becomes more important, not less. Originality without judgment produces possibilities. The client still needs someone prepared to choose.

    Taste is built, not bestowed

    Do does not introduce taste from the position of someone who believes he always possessed it. He describes growing up in Northern California's Silicon Valley in the 1980s with limited exposure to art and culture. Travel, too, was unfamiliar: he remembers his first flight, around age 16 or 17, from San Jose to San Diego.

    At Art Center, he encountered people whose experiences seemed broader. Some were older. Others had traveled through countries he had never visited. He saw a gap between their cultural exposure and his own, and the question became how to close it.

    His answer was curiosity pursued with intensity.

    He recalls going to the library, gathering 25 magazines at a time, and scanning their pages. The purpose was sustained exposure: photographs, architecture, illustration, art, and the visual decisions other people had already considered worth publishing. This was not a claim to instant sophistication. It was a way to begin building a more informed eye.

    “Answers are cheap. Taste isn't,” Do says.

    He presents two related capabilities that need different kinds of practice:

    • Original creativity and conceptual ideation. Generate possibilities, connect experience, and accept the risk of an unfamiliar idea.
    • Taste and creative judgment. Discern what works, what fits the brand, and what deserves to move forward.

    The first expands the field. The second makes distinctions within it. This is why his argument does not end with celebrating an unusual idea. The professional must also develop a vocabulary for evaluating it and a basis for explaining the choice.

    His library method uses existing curation as a starting point. An architecture magazine has already passed its contents through an editorial selection process. In Do's telling, that makes it a useful place to encounter work chosen by people with a more developed understanding of the field.

    The value is not that every published selection must be accepted. It is that the beginner does not have to start with an undifferentiated flood of everything. Selection offers a foothold. Repeated exposure supplies material for comparison.

    That attention to sources makes Logo Inspirations a relevant companion subject. Do's own emphasis is broader than any single discipline: studying creative history gives the professional more to recognize than whatever is currently circulating.

    He recommends starting in the present and working backward through earlier years. Across decades, repeated patterns become easier to notice. The exercise is meant to separate enduring ideas from the temporary familiarity of a current style.

    For professionals intimidated by someone else's apparent sophistication, his personal account offers a practical reframe. Cultural exposure is not evenly distributed, but the gap is not automatically a verdict. His proposed response is not to pretend to possess taste. It is to study enough material to begin earning judgment.

    The idea needs someone who can carry it

    Judgment does not sell itself. A creative professional can choose a strong direction and still fail to help another person understand why it matters. Do treats storytelling and communication as the bridge between an internal decision and someone else's willingness to support it.

    His account of running Blind makes the commercial stakes concrete. Agencies evaluating production companies were considering strong competitors and substantial budgets. In those circumstances, he says, a smaller company could win without having the longest record or the strongest work if it understood and connected with the people making the decision.

    This is his experience of selling creative services, not a guarantee that interpersonal ability overrides every other qualification. The distinction is narrower and more useful: technical capability was not the only thing being assessed. The conversation itself gave the prospect evidence about the working relationship.

    One prospect asked whether he understood the business and had looked at its website. Do recalls answering “no and no.” He did not want to begin the relationship by pretending to have knowledge he lacked.

    His reasoning was that a direct conversation with the client could reveal things the website could not. In his account, that exchange was one of the factors that helped secure a $100,000 logo assignment. The story is not a recommendation to avoid research. Its force comes from refusing to substitute a performance of certainty for an honest conversation.

    That refusal is part of his broader communication argument. A polished answer is not always the same thing as a credible answer. Sometimes the more useful move is to make the limits of current knowledge visible and give the client room to explain.

    Do describes a second chapter in which his audience changed. He had learned to connect in business conversations, but speaking to a camera introduced a different problem: there was no immediately responsive person on the other side. Public speaking introduced another setting, with its own pressure and internal anxiety.

    The skills had to be adapted, not merely transferred unchanged.

    He describes learning to let go of impressing people and focus on serving them. The feedback he values concerns connection: listeners feeling that the message reached them personally, even when delivered through a lens or from a stage.

    The broader subject appears in Storytelling Is A Superpower. In this account, storytelling is inseparable from delivery: tone, timing, humor, vulnerability, and the willingness to sound like an actual person.

    For a creative professional, that places communication inside the work's value, not after it. The explanation helps the client interpret what has been made and decide what to do with it. An idea that stays entirely inside its maker's head cannot perform that function.

    Trust can outlive the assignment

    Years after working with a client named Robert, Do received a message asking whether he still had the same number. They had not maintained contact through emails or regular check-ins. Do places the earlier work roughly a decade or two in the past, without fixing an exact interval.

    The message pleased him before it became a business opportunity.

    Robert eventually booked him to run a workshop for his team. When they met again, Do remembers greeting him with a warm hug and feeling that the long gap had briefly collapsed. The relationship was not being rebuilt from nothing simply because the contact had stopped.

    He uses that story to distinguish relationship building from an isolated moment of empathy. Reading someone's hesitation matters within a conversation. A relationship concerns what remains afterward: whether the person remembers being treated with care and wants to work together again.

    His final two skills therefore operate at different distances:

    • Storytelling and communication skills. Make ideas understandable and meaningful through writing, speaking, and presentation.
    • Client partnership and relationship building. Build trust that extends beyond the immediate assignment.

    The Robert story is especially revealing because it does not depend on an elaborate follow-up routine. Do explicitly says he had not kept in touch. What he emphasizes instead is the feeling preserved from their earlier experience working together.

    That should not be turned into a rule that client relationships need no attention. It is one recollection illustrating a narrower point: the quality of an interaction can remain meaningful after the professional circumstances that created it have changed.

    It also complicates the idea that a portfolio is a complete professional identity. Robert did not simply encounter an anonymous selection of relevant work. He contacted a person he already knew. The workshop followed a remembered relationship, not only a match between a service and a requirement.

    This is where Do directs his sharpest challenge toward introverted creatives. The comfort of working alone in front of a screen can become a limitation when the finished work is the only thing other people encounter. The professional remains largely invisible behind the output.

    The issue is not that quiet people must become theatrical. Do explicitly leaves room for awkwardness and unconventional personalities. His preference is for genuine contact over an impressive performance, including the occasional face-to-face meeting.

    There is a career implication beneath that social advice. Someone who defines an entire identity through a particular kind of deliverable leaves little visible room for change. Do's own account moves from production work to speaking and workshops. The person connects those chapters even when the service changes.

    A client relationship can recognize that continuity. A gallery of finished projects, by itself, has a harder time showing it.

    A different standard of professional practice

    Do calls these high-income skills, but the conversation provides neither a salary forecast nor a guarantee of irreplaceability. Its practical force lies elsewhere. Each skill moves the professional beyond supplying an artifact and toward helping another person make sense of a decision.

    The sequence matters. Strategic thinking establishes the problem. Empathy helps the professional understand the people involved. Ideation produces possible directions, while taste supports selection. Communication makes the choice intelligible, and relationship building gives the working connection a life beyond the handoff.

    They are not six substitute job titles. They are capabilities that can operate together inside the same assignment.

    The resulting practice is less glamorous than the promise of becoming permanently immune to technological change. It involves studying material that is unfamiliar, asking questions before asserting expertise, explaining decisions clearly, and allowing clients to encounter the person responsible for the work.

    Do's practical recommendations can be put to work without turning them into another production contest:

    • Use client conversations to understand purpose and reconcile conflicting ideas before rushing into execution.
    • Pay attention when someone hesitates. The response to the proposal belongs in the discussion.
    • Study photography, art, illustration, and architecture rather than relying only on current creative output.
    • Work backward through curated publications to notice ideas that recur across decades.
    • Practice explaining ideas through writing, on camera, and in person.
    • Let relationships extend beyond the presentation of finished work.

    These recommendations ask for different forms of effort. Some are solitary, including the patient accumulation of visual references. Others require exposure: an honest admission in a sales conversation, a story told through a camera, or a meeting that cannot be controlled as tightly as a design file.

    The balance is important. His argument does not ask creatives to abandon making things and become nothing but presenters. It asks them to stop treating presentation, judgment, and human contact as secondary to the making.

    Nor does his conclusion call for refusing AI. He explicitly encourages using the tools. The professional task, in his account, is to avoid confusing access to a powerful tool with a complete offer to a client.

    A generated option still enters a human situation: someone has a purpose, competing concerns, an emotional response, and a decision to make. Do's proposed advantage is deeper participation in that situation. Not simply more output placed in front of it.

    The immediate challenge is therefore concrete. A portfolio can demonstrate what has been made. The next conversation must also demonstrate the ability to understand, choose, explain, and care.

    The work shows what a creative can make. The relationship shows why that creative belongs in the room.

    TRANSCRIPT

    If you're scared about what AI means for your career, keep watching. AI is moving fast, tools are getting better, and yes, some jobs sadly will disappear. But if you're a creative professional worried about being replaced, here's what you need to know. In this video, I want to walk you through the six high -income skills creative professionals must learn and strengthen that I believe with full confidence will be more valuable, not less, in the years to come. These aren't just things AI can't do, they're things AI was never designed to do. Now, before I jump in, I do want to clarify something that's really important. These are not the jobs you should be doing, but the skills you should strengthen, stack, and lead with if you want to become irreplaceable. Skill number one, strategic thinking and problem solving. This is the ability to define problems, ask the right questions, and lead creative strategy, especially in branding. And why can't AI do it? AI can give you options, it can even give you a decent answer. But it can't figure out the real problem or lead a client through ambiguity. Strategy is about framing, not just responding. In the last couple of decades, there was a lot of value in the doing, what to do, how to do it. But in the age of AI, when anything can be done just by almost anybody with the ability to type, it's less important what and how, but why. This is where you come in. The machine AI can't figure out the why. And this is where you, in conversation with a client, cannot be replaced. To think strategically, to think long term. And what you can do with your client is by a series of asking smart, strategic questions, you can align and also resolve conflicting ideas. AI can't sit in a client meeting and sense the nuance behind the brief. They can't read the micro expressions. It currently cannot see subtle shifts in body language, which we are naturally wired to pick up. High income skill number two, emotional intelligence and empathy. What does this even mean? The ability to read people, sense what's not. behind the brief. They can't read the micro expressions. It currently cannot see subtle shifts in body language, which we are naturally wired to pick up. High income skill number two, emotional intelligence and empathy. What does this even mean? The ability to read people, sense what's not being said, the subtext, if you will. Creating and communicating in a way that feels right, that just looks right. Because as we've already learned, people remember how you made them feel more than the words you've actually said. And here's why AI won't be able to replace that. AI doesn't feel awkward silences. It doesn't see body language. It doesn't understand why a client hesitated when you said the word rebrand, for example. And when it comes to branding per se, branding is built on emotional connections, not just visuals. Most of our decision making is based on our emotional state. So when we're helping to guide a client to build relationships with the customers in a rebrand, we're trying to understand through experience and intuition, what emotion is going to trigger them to take action. This is why AI cannot replace you in this regard, because it lacks the emotional empathy, because it has never lived a life. And what's really important to achieve that is if you can read the room, you can lead the room. And even outside the world of branding, this is such an important skill to have, because when we're talking to people, there are the words that are being spoken, the things they're aware of, and then there are things that they're not aware of in the emotional states in which they live in. And if you can't figure that out, people are not going to trust you. They're not going to feel like you understand them. They're not going to feel seen and heard. And before anybody would do any business with anyone else, they need to first feel that from you. What people oftentimes forget and don't understand about branding is it's an irrational emotional connection to a product or service. We can't really explain it, but we feel a certain connection to a certain brand of shoes, hotels, cars, or consumer electronics. We have an emotional attachment to an intangible thing or service, even a faceless entity, for which we will feel sad when that entity no longer exists. This is the power of branding. And this is not something that AI yet understands. And this is where the human can play a really important role. It's a difference between having loved and having your heart broken and reading about a story where someone has loved someone else and has their - which we will feel sad when that entity no longer exists. This is the power of branding. And this is not something that AI yet understands. And this is where the human can play a really important role. It's a difference between having loved and having your heart broken and reading about a story when someone has loved someone else and has their heart broken. It's vastly different. Let me try and reframe it this way. Every time you've gone to make a purchasing decision, what informed or influenced your choosing one person or one company over the next? Was it the offerings? Was it the price point? Or was it something else? And at first you might say it was a good deal. It was great service and features. But oftentimes what we don't recognize, it was because there was a gut feeling. And that person made you feel something. And despite it being a little bit more expensive or less feature -laden, you decided to pick them. And oftentimes we're making unconscious bias decisions because of how we feel. For example, if we meet someone and they start speaking about a topic that we care a lot about, if they're a fan of a teen that we love, or if they say something that reminds us of where we originally came from, our hometown, it skews us a little bit towards picking them. Now, unless they say something that gives you that little spider sense where I'm sure I could trust this person, more likely than not, you're using this gut instinct, this intuition to pick. So when you're on the other side and you're selling services and you over -index on features and functions and price point, you are possibly missing the entire point. Sorry to interrupt. I want to let you know that I'm starting this community where we're gonna help people just like you, experts, authors, and coaches to develop your personal brand. It's called Content Lab. So for more information on that, just check out the links in the description. Now back to our show. The next high -income skill is original creativity and conceptual ideation. This is the ability to generate big ideas, to take risks, to make conceptual leaps no machine can predict. And here's why AI can't do it. AI is trained on what's already been done. AI is great at pattern recognition, but breakthrough ideas break patterns. It can remix, but it doesn't originate. It won't surprise you with something that feels risky. Exceptional leaps no machine can predict. And here's why AI can't do it. AI is trained on what's already been done. AI is great at pattern recognition, but breakthrough ideas break patterns. It can remix, but it doesn't originate. It won't surprise you with something that feels risky or weird or human. The courage to be wrong is what creates originality. Great creative ideas often start messy. They're illogical, irrational, and based on intuition. It's you connecting all the dots of your previous lived experiences, the things that you're learning in life, the hard fought battles where you've learned something and being brave enough to see a connection where no one else has seen a connection. This is why it's inherently messy and wasteful, not a linear path. We often say the shortest distance between two points is a line, but in creativity, it's a hot, jumbled, tangled mess. And that's where we birthed the biggest, boldest ideas. So feel confident in your messy process. Feel affirmed that this weird thing that no one else can understand or explain is what makes you unique and highly irreplaceable. In the 20th century, the people who made the most amount of money were convergent thinkers, left -brainers, the people who managed finance, who ran business, but didn't have a lot of imagination. But in the 21st century, divergent thinkers, not convergent thinkers, are the ones who are gonna rule the world. They're the ones who assume there are multiple solutions to any problem and they're looking for the most ideal outcome. As my friend Brian Collins would say, designers are futurists. We rehearse possible future outcomes and we pick the most ideal path towards that outcome. The next creative skill, taste and creative judgment. It's the ability to discern what's good and what isn't. Knowing what works, what's on brand, and what's going to land with people. Let's be honest, AI can give you 50 versions, but it doesn't know which one to pick or why one works better than the other. You see, answers are cheap. Taste isn't. Your job is to curate, to lead, to shape. So knowing this, what do you need to do as a creative professional? This may not be easy for you to hear. You need to study history, than the other you see answers are cheap taste isn't your job is to curate to lead to shape so knowing this what do you need to do as a creative professional this may not be easy for you to hear you need to study history the history of photography of art illustration of architecture you have to go into the annals of human creativity and learn the vocabulary of what it means to be professional at doing it the highest level and within that you start to see what has withstood the test of time what are timeless concepts and ideas and you start to learn the invisible rules that you might have overlooked in the past having great taste having a curatorial eye is not easy this is why there's so many ugly things in the world your job is to immerse yourself in humanities and do the things that you hated to do and instead of just creating since that job is being done by ai is for you to learn about what's happened before so you can make a better more informed decision about what's going to happen in the future so if you don't have great style if you don't have great taste are you totally screwed are you doubly screwed are you screwed because ai will take your job and you don't know what's good or bad so i'm gonna tell you a very personal story here i grew up in northern california in the 80s and i grew up in the valley in silicon valley and i wasn't exposed to a lot of art and culture in fact i think the first time i got an airplane i was like 16 or 17 years old and my brother had flown me down from san jose to san diego and it was an experience for me i was like okay this is interesting all that is to say i'm not a highly cultured person i have pretty unsophisticated tastes i was uncouth as some might say i go to art center and i see there are these europeans or people who are a little older or traveled who've been to spain to italy to germany to the uk and i've never been anywhere except for within northern california so how does one close that gap how does one even compete with these people who literally grew up in hundreds of years of art history and culture what are you supposed to do well you play catch up you adopt this mindset of becoming infinitely curious about lots of things and you become a deep diver become a dolphin so whatever it is that sparks your interest your curiosity go is grew up in hundreds of years of art history and culture what are you supposed to do well you play catch up you adopt this mindset of becoming infinitely curious about lots of things and you become a deep diver become a dolphin so whatever it is that sparks your interest your curiosity go as deep as possible and through this exposure to lots of material content and information you start to recognize your own pattern in a way you combat the pattern recognition machine by becoming your own pattern recognition machine so what i would do is i would go to the library you know there are these places you can go to look at books and magazines for free and sit down and take 25 magazines at a time and little just scan through it you remember that scene in the fifth element with lilu how she was starting to understand human history she's watching a machine that just flashed thousands of images in front of her and she was processing that i want you to become like that where you're consuming lots and lots of things and here's the good news when you pick up a magazine on architecture it's already been curated by someone who understands what good architecture looks like so you're not just seeing everything you're seeing the best of the best being published if you do this for long enough periods when you start with the year that you're in 2025 2026 and just start working backwards eventually you start to see patterns that repeat themselves over the course of a couple of decades with that you'll be armed with a more informed eye you'll be able to see things that most people can't see and not just what most people can't see but what ai can't see now for the next high income skill storytelling and communication skills the ability to take an idea and make people care about it this includes writing speaking and structuring ideas in a way that moves people and here's why ai can't do it ai can generate text but it doesn't connect people don't buy the product they buy the story it doesn't know your personal story you need to be able to communicate what you do or no one will value it so here's the thing your ability to explain your idea is often more valuable than the idea itself if you can present clearly you win trust faster human communication involves tone timing humor and vulnerability all things machines can't easily replicate so i'm going to use So here's the thing. Your ability to explain your idea is often more valuable than the idea itself. If you can present clearly, you win trust faster. Human communication involves tone, timing, humor, and vulnerability. All things machines can't easily represent. So I'm going to use myself as an example here, okay? And I want to delineate this through two chapters on my life. The first one, I ran Blind, a service production company where we made commercials for advertising agencies and large global brands. How did I compete? How did I stand out? It was my ability to be able to empathize and to discern the unspoken emotional intent in the room to be able to read it and to be able to understand and connect and make people feel something. You have to understand something. When agencies are putting out their projects for bid, they're looking at the best in the world. They're potentially awarding one company hundreds of thousands of dollars to do work. How do they make these decisions? Well, I've learned that if you can ask questions and connect with them on a human level, you can actually beat companies that are bigger, have more experience, and do better work than you. And that really taught me a valuable lesson about how humans make decisions. It's less about the technical capability, but how you address their individual needs and if they feel connected to you. One example I love to share with people is when one of our prospects had asked a very direct question and the question was this, Chris, do you understand what we do? Have you looked at our site? And in a split second, I said, no and no. And I think another person would try to BS their way around that, but the reason why I said what I said was, it's my truth. I don't want to tell lies. I don't want to begin a relationship by trying to pretend that I'm something that I'm not. My reason for all of this is, what can I hope to learn by looking at your website that I'm not going to learn by speaking to you? And this is ultimately one of the decisions that got us this $100 ,000 logo assignment. Career part number two is, although I've developed communication skills, the ability to tell stories, if I don't take this to the world, I'm going to stay in that. to you. And this is ultimately one of the decisions that got us this $100 ,000 logo assignment. Career part number two is, although I've developed communication skills, the ability to tell stories, if I don't take this to the world, I'm going to stay in that industry for as long as that industry will have me, which it turns out would not be that much longer. So I needed to learn a different skill. This is the skill to tell stories across platforms, to do it to a piece of glass, this lens, this camera, to an audience that will never see me or be able to respond, and also to be able to do it on stage, which is a different skill, to process my own internal anxiety, to let go of the need to impress people, and to really to be of service to folks. And you know what? The consistent feedback that I usually get when I do public speaking, despite being stacked against heavy hitters, people who have millions or billions of dollars, people who have written best -selling books, and why I'm able to stand out from them is usually they say this one thing, what you say connects with me. And the best compliment I ever got was, you changed the atmosphere in the room, because we feel you're so passionate and genuine about what you're trying to say, that we can process what you're saying in a totally different way. And that is all about human -to -human connection, whether you're doing it on the phone for a prospect, or whether you're doing it on a stage or across a piece of glass. Oftentimes people say in the comments, I feel like you're speaking to me right now. And despite sometimes spiciness of what you're saying, I just feel like you're being really genuine, and I wouldn't have it any other way. Last but not least, high -income skill you need to learn is client partnership and relationship building. And not to confuse, this is not about empathy and connection. This is something very different. What do I mean? Business still comes down to people working with people. It's not B2C, it's not B2B, it's H2H, human -to -human. AI can't read the room, it can't manage egos, navigate politics, or build trust across weeks or years. Relationship capital is a moat AI can't cross. Let me put this in the context of a story. There was a client that I worked with over 10 years ago, maybe even 20 years. I haven't sent out any emails or kept in touch. But one day, I'm checking my phone, and I imagine build trust across weeks or years. Relationship capital is a moat AI can't cross. Let me put this in the context of a story. There was a client that I worked with over 10 years ago, maybe even 20 years. I haven't sent out any emails or kept in touch, but one day I'm checking my phone and a message comes from a voice from the past. It's my friend Robert. And Robert's like, hey Chris, is this still your number? I got something I want to talk to you about. And I have to tell you, just knowing that Robert sent me a text and asked me this question made my heart smile a little bit. And so as robotic as I am, as analytical as I am, it's really nice to know that the relationships that you built decades ago are still a sign of how you made people feel, even though all that time has passed. It was really wonderful as Robert wound up booking me to run a workshop for his team is when I saw him, it's almost if we collapsed 20 years of not talking to each other into a moment. I gave him a big warm hug. I was really happy to see him just because I knew he was doing well in life and I felt the same from him. So this is something that is not going to be replaced by AI. It's how you make people feel. And it's about them knowing that you genuinely care about their well -being, even without maintaining relationships over that time. And here's the message for all my introverted creative people who feel most at home, locked in a room in front of their screens, clicking away at the work, is when you produce work and you only show the work that you do, you're actually creating a barrier for you to connect with people. You are more than the work that you create because sometime in the future, you may no longer be doing this. So you cannot define yourself just purely on the things that you make. This is where I encourage you to get out there, to go outside your comfort zone, to tell your stories in a way that you know how to tell them and to make it go beyond the work. And dare I say it, I actually have a face -to -face meeting from time to time because even if you're awkward and weird, I think as long as you're being genuine and real, people can relate to that. AI is here. It's real and it's very, very powerful. But don't forget, it's just a tool. A smart, powerful tool, but just a tool. It won't build trust. It won't set vision. It won't lead clients. Once you're being genuine and real, people can relate to that. AI is here. It's real. And it's very, very powerful. But don't forget, it's just a tool. A smart, powerful tool, but just a tool. It won't build trust. It won't set vision. It won't lead clients. It won't speak with soul. That's your job. So don't fear the AI tools. Use them and build the skills that AI can't touch. If you've enjoyed this, I want to remind you about Content Lab, something that I've launched. And it's designed to help coaches, content creators, and authors just like you create content that consistently cuts through the clutter.
    Download transcript

    Enjoyed this? There’s more where it came from.

    Get insights on creativity, business, and design from The Futur.

    You can unsubscribe anytime. By submitting, you agree to receive communications and to our Privacy Policy.

    “The courage to be wrong is what creates originality.”

    — Chris Do

    Key Takeaways

    Details

    Topic
    CAREER STRATEGY

    Share