How to Negotiate When Clients Can't Afford Your Prices (Whiteboard)
Chris Do explains how to turn a client's price objection into a high-upside, performance-based deal by shifting the risk.
Chris Do
Founder, The Futur™ · May 9, 2024
Don't Lower Your Price. Change the Deal.
A client wants your services but balks at the price. They need a video, and your $1,000 quote is a non-starter. “I really, really don’t want to spend more than $1,000,” they might say, or perhaps just, “I can’t afford that.”
For most creatives, this is the end of the road. It’s an insult. A dead end. You take it personally, turn defensive, and walk away. But this is a mistake.
Chris Do, founder of The Futur, sees this moment not as a closed door, but as an invitation to a more sophisticated conversation. He proposes an alternative: “I'll do the video for you for free. If we get the results that you want, I'd like a percentage of the results.”
This isn't a discount. It is a fundamental reframing of the entire relationship. You stop being a vendor selling a commodity and start becoming a partner investing in an outcome.
The client in question is what Do calls “risk-averse.” They want the reward without any of the downside. They want to consume the goods and decide later if they feel like paying. This arrangement doesn’t exist in almost any other corner of commerce. You can’t eat a meal, drive a car off the lot, or use a product and then decide if you want to pay. The social contract requires payment for services rendered.
When a client pushes back on price, they are asking you to absorb their risk. In this scenario, the correct response is not to refuse, but to accept the risk and price it accordingly.
The Currency of Risk
The core principle that underpins this entire strategy is one of the bedrocks of business. As legendary management consultant Peter Drucker taught, all profit comes from risk. Whoever is willing to carry the risk demands the highest potential return.
When you provide a service for a flat fee, the client carries the risk. They pay you $1,000, and if the video fails to produce results, it’s their loss. You have been paid for your time and expertise. The risk is theirs, so the potential profit is also theirs.
But when you agree to work for a percentage of the results, the tables turn. Now, you carry the risk. If the video fails, you have worked for free. You’ve invested time, energy, and resources with zero compensation. Because you have shouldered the entire risk, you are now entitled to a significant share of the reward.
This is why simply getting paid your original $1,000 fee on the back end is no longer a fair deal. Do explains, “Who took the risk? If they paid you a thousand bucks, the business owner [took the risk]. Who’s taking the risk now? I am.”
This is not an emotional argument. It's the fundamental economics of value. Risk is a currency, and you must be compensated for spending it.
- The Flat-Fee Model: The client assumes the risk of the project's success. The creative's compensation is capped at the agreed-upon fee.
- The Performance Model: The creative assumes the risk of the project's success. The creative's compensation is tied to the upside, with a potentially much higher ceiling.
This shift in thinking is critical. People who argue that the creator should only be paid if the work succeeds don't understand the nature of risk. To work in hopes of a future result is the very definition of risk. It means forgoing guaranteed income today for a chance at a larger payout tomorrow.
Defining the Win With The 2 Bs
A performance-based deal falls apart without clear, measurable targets. Vague goals like, “I want to feel like it’s a good video,” are a recipe for disaster. The negotiation must shift from subjective feelings to objective business results.
To do this, Do introduces a simple yet powerful framework: The 2 Bs: Baseline and Benchmark. This framework moves the conversation from creative preferences to data-driven outcomes.
The first step is to establish the client’s current state. This is their baseline. You must know where they are to prove you took them somewhere new. Ask direct questions:
- How many customers are you getting per month on average?
- How long have you been stuck at this number?
- What is your gross revenue for the past 12 months?
Let’s say the client, a brick-and-mortar shop owner named Mo, gets 30 customers per month and has been stagnant for years. That is the baseline. The goal of your video is to drive any new business above this number.
Next, you must establish the benchmark. what is a new customer worth? If one new customer is worth $100 to the business, you now have a unit of value to work with. The goal is to get paid for every customer you bring in above the 30-customer baseline.
This sounds simple, but it has complexities. What if, through no fault of the video, the client’s regular business dips to 27 customers one month? If your video brings in three new people, the total is still 30. You get paid nothing. Conversely, if their regular business has a great month and brings in 33 customers, but your video brings in zero, the baseline agreement means you're entitled to a percentage of those three extra customers. This is why a clear contract and mutual trust are non-negotiable. It has to be a true partnership.
This framework is essential. Without a defined baseline and benchmark, you are gambling on a client’s mood. With them, you are entering a business agreement with clear terms for success.
The Hard Math of Growth: LCV and CPA
To negotiate like a true business partner, you need to speak the language of business. This means understanding two fundamental metrics: Lifetime Customer Value and Cost Per Acquisition.
Lifetime Customer Value (LCV) is the total net profit a business can expect to make from a single customer over the entire duration of their relationship. Do breaks down the simple calculation: take your total gross revenue for a year and divide it by the number of customers you served.
Using his co-host D’Go’s business as an example, they calculate his LCV. With $250,000 in gross revenue from 36 clients, his average client is worth $6,944. After accounting for all expenses, D'Go's net profit margin is 20%. This means for every $6,944 client, he nets approximately $1,400 in actual profit.
This number is the key. It tells you what a client is truly worth.
Once you know the LCV, you can determine a reasonable Cost Per Acquisition (CPA). CPA is the amount of money a business can afford to spend to acquire a new customer. Many creatives spend zero dollars on acquiring customers, relying on word of mouth or inconsistent social media efforts. This is a mistake.
Do presents a simple thought experiment. If you sell headphones for $100, and it costs you $50 to make them, your gross profit is $50. If you could spend $45 on marketing to acquire one new customer, would you do it? You would only make $5 in net profit. Many creatives would say no. “It seems like a lot of effort to make $5,” is the common refrain.
This is where business thinking diverges from freelance thinking. A business owner sees an ATM. As long as the system is scalable, you would put $45 in to get $50 back all day long. “If you could spend a million dollars with this basic model,” Do says, “you would just say dump as much money into this as you have possible.”
This is how real businesses grow. Amazon happily pays affiliates 4% to 7% of every sale they drive. Credit card companies spend hundreds of dollars to acquire a single new customer. They understand their LCV and know that as long as their CPA is less than their net profit per customer, it’s a winning formula. This is a concept expertly detailed in works like Ron Baker's philosophy on value.
When you understand these numbers, you can have a radically different conversation with clients. You can also analyze your own business. If your average client is worth $7,000, but some clients pay you $36,000 a year, you have a positioning problem. You must fire your low-value clients to make room for high-value ones, a key strategy for scaling from freelancer to agency owner.
Structuring the Performance-Based Deal
Armed with an understanding of risk, metrics, and business math, you can now structure a deal that protects you and offers massive upside.
In the initial scenario, Do proposes a 50% commission for every new customer generated by the video. To get his original $1,000 fee, at a value of $100 per customer, he would need to generate 20 new customers. The first 20 customers simply get him back to even. The real profit comes from every customer after that.
Is 50% too high? Maybe. Is a perpetual, lifelong commission too long? Probably. But these are starting points for a negotiation. “I said in perpetuity, forever, which is a negotiation point, just like the 50%,” Do clarifies. A savvy business owner would counter-negotiate. Perhaps a lower percentage, or a commission structure that decreases over time.
For example, the deal could be structured with collapsing commissions:
- First $5,000 in generated revenue: You receive a 50% commission.
- Next $5,000 in generated revenue: Your commission drops to 40%.
- All subsequent revenue: Your commission stabilizes at a lower percentage, like 20%.
This model incentivizes you heavily at the beginning to recoup your initial risk and rewards the client with a greater share of the profit as the project becomes a long-term success. The key is that because you took the upfront risk, your total potential earnings must be significantly higher than your original flat fee. If the client thinks that’s unfair, the solution is simple: “Pay the thousand in the first place if you think it’s a sure-done deal.”
The argument is a powerful filter. If the client truly believes in their business and the potential for a great video to drive results, paying a premium on the back end is a smart bet. If they are hesitant, it reveals their own lack of confidence and validates your decision to demand a higher reward for taking the risk.
Of course, this model requires trust. If you have a bad feeling about the client, no contract will save you. But for a deal you want to pursue, legal protection is crucial. You need:
- A Contract: Drafted by an attorney, outlining the baseline, the commission structure, duration, and how results will be tracked.
- Audit Rights: The right to inspect the client’s books to verify the number of new customers.
- Dispute Resolution: A predetermined method for resolving disagreements, such as arbitration or small claims court.
The Guarantee Fallacy
Some clients and creatives believe a service should come with a built-in guarantee of results. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of what is being purchased.
Do uses the analogy of buying a car. A new car comes with a warranty, but that warranty only covers manufacturer defects. If a rock cracks your windshield, you run into a lamppost, or you get into an accident, you are responsible. The warranty doesn’t guarantee a safe or accident-free driving experience.
For that, you buy insurance. You pay a monthly premium for peace of mind, hoping you never have to use it. If you want an extended warranty beyond the manufacturer's term, you pay extra for that too. These are separate products that manage specific risks for an additional fee.
Expecting a $1,000 video to come with a money-back guarantee of business results is like expecting a new car to come with a lifetime, all-inclusive insurance policy for free. It doesn’t make sense.
If a client wants a guarantee, they must pay for it. “If you want a guarantee, what should we charge then?” Do asks. “A lot more money.” A guaranteed result is a premium service that carries an exponentially higher price tag because the provider is now insuring the client's business outcome.
The standard fee for a creative service covers the professional execution of that service. You deliver a video that meets the technical and qualitative specs, on time and on budget. Your portfolio is the proof of your ability to do this. The client reviews your past work and makes an educated decision, just as you would test drive a car.
In a performance deal, the risk you take is its own form of guarantee. Your incentive—getting paid—is directly tied to the success of the video. You will work tirelessly to optimize the title, thumbnail, description, and promotion strategy because your livelihood depends on it. You have skin in the game, a concept that is far more powerful than any hollow money-back promise. It is the purest form of aligning your personal brand with tangible results.
Stop Selling Your Time. Start Investing in Outcomes.
The next time a client tells you they can’t afford your price, resist the urge to get defensive. See it as the opening it is.
You have a choice. You can be a vendor, trading hours for dollars in a race to the bottom. Or you can be a partner, investing your talent in exchange for a share of the value you create.
This requires a new mindset. You must learn the language of business, understand the metrics that matter, and have the confidence to negotiate from a position of value, not cost.
Stop apologizing for your prices. Start structuring deals that reflect the risk you're willing to take and the results you're capable of delivering.
The client who can’t afford your $1,000 fee might be the one who ends up paying you $10,000. It all depends on whether you're willing to change the conversation from cost to investment.
Your risk is your leverage. Use it.
TRANSCRIPT
Enjoyed this? There’s more where it came from.
Get insights on creativity, business, and design from The Futur.
You can unsubscribe anytime. By submitting, you agree to receive communications and to our Privacy Policy.
“In business, all profit comes from risk.”
— Chris Do
Key Takeaways
Subscribe
Details
- Length
- 52m
- Views
- 42,146
- Topic
- NEGOTIATION