FBI Negotiator Teaches Art Of Negotiation (Masterclass w/ Chris Voss)
Chris Do and former FBI negotiator Chris Voss reveal why your sales tactics are failing and how to use tactical empathy to win any deal.
Chris Do
Founder, The Futur™ · July 20, 2023
Everything You Know About "Yes" Is Wrong
Everything you've been taught about getting to yes is wrong. It’s not just ineffective; it’s actively costing you deals, relationships, and revenue.
The entire sales culture built around nodding heads and micro-agreements is a house of cards. It’s a relic of a bygone era, yet countless professionals still cling to it, wondering why their clients ghost and their deals fall apart at the last minute.
According to former FBI lead international kidnapping negotiator Chris Voss, the addiction to “yes” is one of the biggest myths in negotiation. “Thou shalt not covet yes,” he states, a commandment for a new era of communication. The pursuit of agreement has been confused with the pursuit of a single word.
In a wide-ranging masterclass with Chris Do, Voss dismantles the flawed logic that has dominated sales training for decades. He offers a new framework, not of manipulation, but of genuine understanding and influence. It’s a method honed not in corporate boardrooms, but in situations where the stakes were life and death.
The Tyranny of Yes Momentum
There are three kinds of yes: commitment, confirmation, and counterfeit. Most salespeople are experts at collecting the last two, mistaking them for the first.
The problem lies in a pervasive technique Voss calls yes momentum. “You get people to say yes to the little things, each one is known as a micro-agreement or a tie-down,” Voss explains. “And then consequently you can get them to say yes to the big thing because you got them tied down.”
This approach might feel like progress. A salesperson failing to close any deals might move from an F-grade performance to a D or even a C. “You look at the distance that you improve and you’re like, ‘wow, you know I was failing before, now I’m not failing,’” Voss says. “However, from your perspective, you don't understand that you are nowhere near a B student or even an A student.”
The fatal flaw is psychological. We’ve all been on the receiving end of this tactic. From the moment a stranger asks, “Have you got a few minutes to talk?” our guards go up. “Everybody's instantaneous reaction is to be concerned,” Voss notes. Every forced “yes” creates tension, fosters suspicion, and makes the other person hold back information. It poisons the well of collaboration before you even begin.
Do shares a story of his wife being approached by a stranger in their car. When asked his wife’s name, a simple question she couldn’t logically say “no” to, her gut reaction was to shut him down with a firm “No.” This instinct is a defense mechanism against a perceived trap.
Why does this failed strategy persist?
- A Misleading Metric of Progress: People compare their mediocre results to their past failures, not to their potential success. Moving from an F to a C feels like a huge win, blinding them to the A-level results they are leaving on the table.
- The Illusion of Control: Micro-agreements give the salesperson a false sense of control over the conversation, even as the prospect grows more and more wary.
- Fear of Rejection: Many are terrified of hearing “no.” They engineer conversations to avoid it, listening with what Voss calls “happy ears” for any hint of positivity, no matter how disingenuous.
This is not a path to a deal. It's a path to being ghosted. Voss’s method flips this on its head. Instead of fearing “no,” you should welcome it. A tactical “no” is more valuable than five counterfeit “yeses” because it signals that the other person feels safe enough to be honest. It is the beginning of a real conversation, not the end of a contrived one. This is a core idea in effective sales, as explored in our workshop on closing more deals.
Are You the Favorite or the Fool?
You thought you had a deal. The client said all the right things, they seemed enthusiastic, they agreed to your proposal. Then, silence. They’ve ghosted you. What happened?
Chances are, you were never in the running in the first place. You were the fool in the game. Voss calls this being used for proof of life. “There’s pretty good data out there that at least 20 percent of the time you’re being used for a competing bid, due diligence, or free consulting,” he says. Based on his firm's experience, he believes the number is much higher, perhaps as high as 80 percent.
Most salespeople have a gut instinct that this is happening, but they are armed with the wrong tools to diagnose it. Conventional sales wisdom suggests asking a direct, yes-oriented question like, “Are we the vendor of choice?”
This is a catastrophic mistake.
“You’re going to get an answer of yes no matter what,” Voss states. If you are the favorite, they’ll say yes. But if you’re not the vendor of choice, they would be foolish to tell you no. They still need your bid for their due diligence. “It’s like asking a liar, ‘Are you lying to me?’ That dude is not gonna tell you.”
To uncover the truth, you need to ask a question that forces them to think, a question that breaks their script. Voss offers a simple but powerful alternative: “On a scale of one to ten, what’s the percentage chance that we’re going to get the deal?”
This is a “what” question, which requires a calculated response. The power isn’t in the number they give you, but in how long it takes them to give it. Voss explains, “It’s not so much what the answer is, it’s how quickly they change. If you’re the favorite, they’re going to go, ‘Oh, nine out of ten, eight out of ten.’ They’re going to immediately give you a very high number.”
If there’s hesitation, a long pause, an “uhm” while they try to calculate a convincing lie, you have your answer. As the saying goes, liars have to think, truth-tellers just remember. That hesitation is a signal. “Houston, we have a problem,” Voss quips.
This moment of hesitation is an opportunity to gather data. While they are thinking, you should be observing. Their facial expressions, their body language, the flicker of calculation in their eyes will tell you more than their words ever could. This is the art of dynamic silence: you shut up and use your eyes.
The Art of a Graceful Exit
You’ve asked the question. You saw the hesitation. You know you’re not the top choice. What now? Most people either give up in frustration or, worse, double down on their pitch, desperately trying to change the client's mind. Both are losing strategies.
The correct move is to change your objective. Your new landing spot is not to close this deal today, but to position yourself for the next one. This is rooted in what Voss calls the OPA rule: the last impression is the lasting impression.
“I want long-term relationships or prosperity with everybody that I deal with,” Voss says. “That deal might not be now.”
The goal is to exit with grace, dignity, and empathy, leaving the door open for a future where you are the trusted advisor. You do this by using labels—observational statements that articulate the other person’s perspective without judgment.
You might say things like:
- “It seems like you’re still shopping around.”
- “It seems like you’re still in the information-gathering phase.”
- “It seems like you’ve got somebody else you really want to do business with.”
Each label is a diagnostic tool, designed to trigger a verbal and visual response. They demonstrate emotional intelligence and self-awareness. You continue down this path, acknowledging their position: “It sounds like right now you’re not ready to do business with us. And there’s a really good chance that you don’t trust me enough for me to be your trusted advisor.”
By articulating their reality, you shift from a desperate salesperson to a perceptive partner. You then clearly state your vision for mutual prosperity and what a great deal with you looks like. You are not begging for the work; you are defining the terms under which you create value, a concept central to the ideas in value-based pricing.
This approach can expose predatory behavior. A client who was simply using you will often become angry when their tactic is foiled. Voss shares an example of a real estate agent, coached by his colleague Steve Shull, who refused to do a free listing presentation. The potential client emailed back furiously, “Just because you wouldn’t give us this presentation, we have crossed you off our list.”
Voss’s analysis is sharp. “That’s a very predatory move and it’s a complete confirmation that they were being played,” he explains. “The predator will become angry with the victim for escaping.” This reaction is a gift. It confirms your gut instinct and solidifies the wisdom of walking away. This is an application of understanding the Karpman Drama Triangle, where a manipulator switches between the persecutor and victim roles to maintain control.
The Voice as a Strategic Instrument
How you say something is often more important than what you say. Your voice is not just a medium for words; it’s a tool for influencing emotion. Voss studies great communicators like Chris Rock and Lewis Black, who use tonality and pacing to deliver insightful, even confrontational, social commentary in a way that audiences accept and absorb.
Voss identifies three primary tones of voice in negotiation, which correspond to the three basic human responses to conflict: fight, flight, or make friends.
1. The Assertive Voice: This is the direct, blunt, honest voice. “Give me a call in 60 seconds or she dies,” Voss says, mimicking his old hostage negotiator days. It feels good to use, making you feel like you’re standing up for yourself. But it’s almost always counterproductive. “The people on my side of the table love it,” he admits. “And the other side always feels smacked around.” It creates adversaries, not partners.
2. The Accommodator Voice: This is the smiling, positive, relationship-oriented voice. It’s light and optimistic. This is the default for about a third of the population, and it’s highly effective for building rapport and delivering difficult information without creating friction. Do notes he used to call this his “flirting voice” because of its universal effectiveness in disarming people.
3. The Analyst (Late-Night FM DJ) Voice: This is a downward-inflecting, calming, and soothing voice. When deployed correctly, it signals confidence and unshakeable resolve without being aggressive. It’s the voice you use when you have to take an immovable position.
Voss gives a powerful example. His company, The Black Swan Group, will not accept “work for hire” clauses in contracts because it would mean giving away their core asset: their intellectual property. When a client sends a contract with this clause, they don't ask for it to be removed. Asking triggers the law of reciprocity, implying they owe something in return. Instead, they simply state in a calm, downward-inflecting tone: “We don’t do work for hire.”
Then, silence.
The statement isn’t a threat. It’s a fact. It lands not as an attack, but as an unchangeable reality. More often than not, the other side simply says, “Oh, well, I’ll have it taken out.” If they resist, the next move is another calm label: “Doesn’t sound like we’re in a position to do business at this time.” It communicates strength and preserves the relationship for a time when the other party is ready to truly collaborate. Mastering this kind of strategic communication is key to a successful career.
Defusing Negatives with an Accusations Audit
Human beings are wired for negativity. Up to 75% of our reactive thoughts are negative. Most people try to overcome this by being relentlessly positive, which is like trying to put out a fire with a squirt gun. A far more efficient approach is to simply deactivate the negatives before they can take root.
Voss’s tool for this is the accusations audit, a technique he calls one of his single most powerful strategies. The concept is simple: you list every negative assumption, fear, and accusation the other side might be thinking about you, and you say it out loud first.
It’s the move Eminem’s character, B-Rabbit, pulls in the final rap battle of the film 8 Mile. He takes every insult his opponent could possibly use against him and owns it, leaving his rival speechless and disarmed.
This is profoundly counterintuitive. We are taught to deny negatives. We say, “I don’t want this to sound disrespectful,” which, as Voss points out, is a comedy routine that guarantees the next sentence will be disrespectful. The correct approach is to say, “This is going to sound disrespectful.” Acknowledging the negative defuses it.
An accusations audit at the beginning of a meeting might sound like this:
“You’re probably going to feel like you’re wasting your time. You’re probably wondering why you’re even talking to me in the first place. You’re probably going to think what I want is unfair. You’re probably going to think I’m greedy.”
Then you shut up and let it sink in. By voicing their internal monologue, you demonstrate empathy and awareness. You’ve taken away their ammunition. Their brain, no longer needing to hold onto those negative thoughts, is cleared and ready to listen.
This is backed by neuroscience. Studies using fMRI scans show that when people are asked to simply label a negative emotion they are feeling, activity in the amygdala, the brain’s fear center, decreases. Calling out the elephant in the room makes it smaller. Trying to pretend it isn’t there makes everyone fixate on it.
This is the difference between philosophical advice and battlefield-tested tactics. “We have the most robust coaching practice of any of our competitors,” Voss says, contrasting his firm’s hands-on work with more academic approaches. “The accusations audit is really one of those things that makes a huge difference proactively.”
The Path to Mastery is Paved with Practice
At this point, many people object. “It’s easy for Chris Voss to say, ‘We don’t do work for hire,’” they argue. “He can walk away from a deal. I can’t.”
This thinking is a trap. Voss’s response is direct, borrowing a line Denzel Washington delivers in the movie Man on Fire: “There's no good or bad, there's only trained and untrained.”
At one point, Tiger Woods didn’t know how to swing a golf club. Michael Jordan was cut from his high school basketball team. Every master was once a novice. The difference is a commitment to practice. Not just any practice, but perfect practice.
Voss references Daniel Coyle’s book, The Talent Code, which describes how musicians learn difficult passages by playing them slowly, stopping to correct every mistake. Each correct repetition wraps the neural connection in a substance called myelin, which acts like insulation on a wire, making the signal faster and more efficient. The focus is on executing properly before executing quickly.
This is the key: small stakes practice for high stakes results. You have seven, eight, or nine opportunities every single day to practice these skills. The Starbucks barista, your Lyft driver, your own family. Every interaction is a chance to increase your emotional intelligence.
You can even practice in your own head. Citing neuroscientist Andrew Huberman, Voss explains that visualizing an action triggers the same neural pathways as actually performing it. “If you can go back and imagine yourself saying a combo, if you can imagine yourself reacting calmly, keeping your cool, that’s practice,” he says. Too often, we do the opposite. We rehearse failure: “I just see myself losing my cool again.” You have control over the movie playing in your head.
Negotiation with family can be the most difficult training ground of all. The long history, the inadvertent wounds from the past, and the high stakes of the relationship create a minefield of emotional triggers. Voss shares a poignant and humorous story about his son, Brandon, who still vividly remembers the moment his father bluntly told him there was no Santa Claus, a moment Voss himself has no memory of. His son had just gotten into a fight at school defending his father’s honor against a kid who called Santa a lie.
The lesson isn't about Santa Claus. It's about being a straight shooter. A straight shooter isn’t someone who uses the truth as a blunt weapon. That’s just being abrasive. A straight shooter tells the truth with tactical empathy and emotional intelligence. They don't deceive by omission. They tell the truth gently, giving the other person a moment to brace for impact.
Your reputation as a straight shooter is the most valuable currency you have, in business and in life. It is something developed and honed through training, not something you are born with.
Stop looking for the secret technique or the magic phrase. The secret is in the repetitions. It's in the decision to be a student of human interaction, to get the reps in, day after day.
You are either trained or untrained. The choice is yours.
TRANSCRIPT
Enjoyed this? There’s more where it came from.
Get insights on creativity, business, and design from The Futur.
You can unsubscribe anytime. By submitting, you agree to receive communications and to our Privacy Policy.
“There's no good or bad, there's only trained and untrained.”
— Chris Do
Key Takeaways
Subscribe
Details
- Length
- 47m
- Views
- 182,578
- Topic
- NEGOTIATION