Brand Principles For The 21st Century with Kevin Finn (some explicit language)
Designer Kevin Finn joins Chris Do to dismantle the myth that logos make brands, revealing the true principles of 21st-century branding.
Chris Do
Founder, The Futur™ · April 11, 2023
The Great Deception in Design
Design studios, branding firms, and ad agencies love to make a bold claim: “We build brands.”
You have seen it on their websites, right under a grid of logos. It is a powerful, declarative statement meant to convey authority and comprehensive capability. According to designer and author Kevin Finn, it is also fundamentally untrue.
“It frustrates me because this isn't what we do as designers,” Finn states. “What they're referencing in fact is logos, websites, communications assets… We cannot claim the entirety of a brand because we've designed a logo.”
This is not a minor semantic quibble. It is a foundational misunderstanding that misleads clients and sets designers up for failure. A logo is not a brand. At best, it is a canvas.
Finn argues that the brand gives the logo its value, not the other way around. The visual mark is an empty vessel at its creation. Over time, it absorbs the meaning, reputation, and associations derived from the company’s every action, product, and interaction. The brand is what fills the canvas.
A Canvas for Meaning
Consider the iconic octagonal mark for Chase Manhattan Bank. Designed by the legendary firm Chermayeff & Geismar during a merger, the abstract symbol was chosen precisely because it meant nothing. It represented neither banking nor the history of the merged companies.
As designer Tom Geismar explained, the bank had tremendous advertising resources that could “quickly establish the symbol in the public mind.” The logo was not the brand; it was the focal point for building one. It became the container for decades of customer experiences, financial transactions, and marketing investments.
The same principle applies to New Zealand apparel company Canterbury. Its logo combines three overlapping circles, the silhouette of a native Kiwi bird, and a subtle reference to “Canterbury Clothing Company.” But without prior knowledge, the mark communicates none of this backstory.
Its power comes from decades of association with the legendary All Blacks rugby team and a reputation for durable sportswear. The brand, built through product performance and strategic partnerships, imbued the logo with its rugged, athletic meaning.
Even a cultural behemoth like Supreme proves the point. The ubiquitous red box logo, famously appropriated from the work of artist Barbara Kruger, says nothing about skateboarding or streetwear. Its billion-dollar valuation is a direct result of the brand’s carefully cultivated scarcity, counter-culture attitude, and community-building prowess.
In all these cases, the designer did not build the brand. They designed a platform for the brand to build itself.
The Designer’s True Role
So if designers do not build brands, what is their function? And are there any exceptions?
Finn concedes that designers can help build a brand, but only under specific circumstances where their involvement transcends a typical project-based engagement.
He outlines three scenarios:
- The Long-Term Strategic Partner. When a designer is embedded with a company for years, influencing strategy, product development, and internal systems. They may hold equity and have a seat at the executive table, giving them ongoing influence over the actions that truly define the brand.
- The Founder or Owner. A designer who starts their own business is, by definition, working to build the brand every day. They are not just creating assets; they are delivering services, shaping customer experiences, and living the company’s values from the inside. Their design skills become a tool for executing the brand promise.
- The In-House Leader. An influential in-house designer can shape a company’s culture and direction from within. This was once seen as a lesser career path, but today’s design-led companies recognize the power of having senior creative talent deeply integrated into the business. Their success, however, depends on their seniority and whether the company truly values design beyond aesthetics.
The common thread is depth and duration. Building a brand is a long-term, whole-of-organization effort. It is not a six-week or six-month project that can be outsourced and forgotten. As Finn notes, this kind of strategic thinking is a core part of a winning brand strategy.
“It is a long-term and evolving objective,” Finn says. “It requires dedication and commitment. Building and maintaining your brand cannot be outsourced.”
Redefining Our Terms: Brand, Branding, and Purpose
To move forward, the industry must get clear on its definitions.
A brand is who you are. It is the sum of every experience someone has with your business. It is your reputation, your promise, and the value you deliver every day. Finn emphasizes, “It cannot be manufactured, created, or invented by an external consultant, because then you'll be required to live up to someone else's vision rather than your own.”
Branding, on the other hand, is how you articulate and communicate your brand. This is where designers are indispensable. It is the craft of creating the logos, websites, and campaigns that express the company’s core identity across various channels.
This distinction leads to a more profound question: what is the purpose of that identity? Many business owners will say their purpose is to make money. But Finn argues that money is a function, an outcome. It is not a purpose that inspires employees or connects with customers on a human level.
The conversation is shifting. Author and educator Anna Lappé captured the growing sense of consumer agency with her famous line: “Every time you spend money, you're casting a vote for the type of world you want to live in.”
This is not just an idealist’s dream. It is a market reality reinforced by the world’s largest investors. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, which manages nearly $10 trillion in assets, has been sending annual letters to CEOs for years, warning them of this shift.
“Without a sense of purpose, no company, either public or private, can achieve its full potential,” Fink writes. “It will ultimately lose the license to operate from its key stakeholders.” He has put his portfolio companies on notice: act with purpose, or risk being divested.
From Purpose to Measurable Impact
Purpose is a powerful motivator, but it can also be vague. The true metric for the 21st-century brand, Finn argues, is a single word: impact.
He illustrates this with an elegant thought experiment from Dr. Edward de Bono, the originator of lateral thinking. Imagine a factory on a riverbank that draws clean water from upstream and dumps polluted wastewater downstream, harming the environment and the communities below.
De Bono’s solution? Swap the intake and outtake pipes. Force the factory to draw its water from its own downstream pollution. The impact is immediate. To survive, the factory must clean its own waste. It is a simple conceptual flip with massive operational consequences. This idea, once a theoretical exercise, has since become law in some countries.
This is the relationship between purpose and impact. “Purpose is motivational, impact is measurable,” Finn explains. Purpose without impact is just a collection of nice words on a poster. Impact without purpose can be scattershot and purely functional.
Together, they form the foundation of the modern brand. Understanding how to connect these concepts is central to building a personal brand that stands out and avoids becoming generic.
The Evidence Is All Around Us
This shift from abstract purpose to tangible impact is not a future trend. It is already here, reshaping industries from top to bottom.
The data is clear:
- A 2015 Cone Communications study found that 91% of millennials would switch brands to one associated with a cause.
- A 2018 Harvard Business Review report revealed that 9 out of 10 people are willing to trade a percentage of their lifetime earnings for greater meaning at work. The average was a staggering 20% of future salary, leading researchers to add meaningful work to the list of basic human needs alongside food, clothing, and shelter.
These are not just statistics; they are the people who are your future customers, employees, and leaders. Businesses are responding accordingly, not just for ethical reasons but for survival.
Consider the actions of major global corporations:
- Lego is investing heavily to eliminate its dependence on petroleum-based plastics, aiming to make all its bricks from plant-based or recycled materials by 2030, without sacrificing quality.
- McDonald's has committed to sourcing 100% of its packaging from renewable or recycled sources by 2025, donating millions of pounds of food, and reducing employment barriers for millions of people.
- Aldi UK's CEO sent a non-negotiable letter to all suppliers, mandating that their packaging be 100% recyclable, reusable, or compostable by 2025. Those who cannot adapt will be dropped.
Startups are building this ethos in from day one. Australian company Great Wrap created a plant-based, plastic-free cling wrap that breaks down in a home compost bin faster than an orange peel. Its impact is built directly into its product.
This mandate is rippling through the entire economic system. The European Central Bank is assessing climate risks on bank balance sheets. Investors are recognizing that companies with a negative impact carry a lower valuation and higher cost of capital. Governments are getting involved, like when Germany implemented a 9-euro monthly train pass to combat inflation, which had the secondary impact of cutting 1.8 million tons of CO2 emissions.
The New ROI: Return On Impact
Whether they are driven by ethics or business survival, the outcome is the same. Companies are realizing they must account for their impact on the world. This has created a new, virtuous business model that Finn simplifies into a powerful equation:
Impact = Relevance = Revenue
When a company makes a positive impact, it becomes relevant to the lives and values of modern consumers. Relevance builds trust and connection, which in turn drives transactions and generates revenue. That revenue can then be reinvested into creating even more impact, which increases relevance, and so on. The pursuit of growth and the pursuit of good become one and the same—a principle that echoes through discussions on value and pricing.
This transforms the entire framework for business success. The old model of prioritizing profit is obsolete. In the new model, revenue is the outcome of a well-executed impact strategy.
This also requires a fundamental shift in communication. Finn delivers a critical insight for all marketers, writers, and brand builders: “No one cares about your well-crafted story. What they do care about is where your story shows up in their story.”
It is not about broadcasting what you do. It is about demonstrating your relevance to the customer’s world, their problems, and their aspirations.
In this new paradigm, ROI will no longer stand for Return on Investment.
It will evolve to mean Return on Impact.
After losing both his parents to cancer at young ages, Finn was struck by a profound realization. “We don't know how much time we have,” he reflects. This led him to a personal and professional mantra, a blunt reminder of the stakes.
“We don't have time to fuck around.”
This is not a call for recklessness, but for deliberate, meaningful action. It is a challenge to individuals who are too scared to pursue their ideas, and to businesses focused solely on growing revenue to no meaningful end. For Finn, it crystallized into a personal mission: to have a positive impact at scale.
That is the charge for every creator, designer, and business leader today.
Every day we are designing our future, whether we know it or not.
And history is watching.
TRANSCRIPT
Enjoyed this? There’s more where it came from.
Get insights on creativity, business, and design from The Futur.
You can unsubscribe anytime. By submitting, you agree to receive communications and to our Privacy Policy.
“The logo doesn't make the brand; the brand gives the logo its value.”
— Chris Do
Key Takeaways
Subscribe
Details
- Length
- 43m
- Views
- 13,912
- Topic
- BRAND STRATEGY